Cabling and media
Copper UTP categories, single-mode versus multimode fiber, Ethernet shared media and point-to-point connections, and Power over Ethernet.
Copper and fiber media
Copper UTP dominates horizontal access runs. Higher categories tighten twist rates and shielding to support higher frequencies: Cat5e and Cat6 carry 1G to 100 m; Cat6a carries 10G to 100 m. Copper is cheap and carries PoE, but it suffers EMI pickup and the hard 100 m channel limit (90 m permanent link + 10 m patch).
Single-mode versus multimode fiber
| Property | Multimode (MMF) | Single-mode (SMF) |
|---|---|---|
| Core diameter | 50 µm (OM3/OM4) or 62.5 µm (OM1) | ~9 µm |
| Light source | LED/VCSEL, 850 nm | Laser, 1310/1550 nm |
| Modal dispersion | Limits reach | Negligible — one light path |
| Typical reach (10G) | 300 m (OM3) / 400 m (OM4) | 10 km+ (10GBASE-LR) |
| Relative cost | Cheaper optics | Cheaper per metre cable, pricier optics |
| Use | Inside buildings/data halls | Between buildings, campus backbone, WAN |
Fiber is immune to EMI and beats the 100 m copper limit; pick SMF for distance and future speed.
Copper UTP categories (100 m channel)
| Category | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cat5e | 1000BASE-T | Baseline for gigabit access runs |
| Cat6 | 1G, 10G to ~55 m | Better crosstalk margin than Cat5e |
| Cat6a | 10GBASE-T to 100 m | Thicker, often shielded |
Shared media and point-to-point
Ethernet links are either point-to-point or shared media. A full-duplex link between a host and a switch port is point-to-point: only two transmitters exist, so collisions are impossible and both ends can send simultaneously. Legacy hubs create a shared media half-duplex segment where CSMA/CD arbitrates — one transmitter at a time, collisions normal. Modern switched networks are effectively all point-to-point full-duplex; a half-duplex reading on a switchport today is a fault indicator, not a design.
- Distance
- 450 m between buildings
- Speed
- 10 Gbps required
- Environment
- Heavy electrical equipment nearby
- Copper fails immediately: the 100 m channel limit cannot reach 450 m.
- MMF OM3 only reaches ~300 m at 10G — marginal for the distance (both fiber types ignore EMI).
- SMF with 10GBASE-LR optics reaches ~10 km comfortably.
Single-mode fiber with LR optics is the only listed option that meets the 1 km distance at 10G.
Verification and troubleshooting
Verifying the physical layer
show interfaces statusshows speed, duplex and whether the link trained at the expected rate.- An interface stuck at 100 Mb on a known-gigabit cable run suggests a bad pair or damaged termination — gigabit needs all four pairs.
show interfacescounters such as CRC and runts point to physical-layer faults; verify media before blaming configuration.- Fiber links that pass light but flap can indicate dirty connectors or the wrong optic type for the cable plant.
Common mistakes
- Assuming 'fiber is always faster' — optics and standard determine speed; MMF and SMF carry the same rates at different distances.
- Running 10G over Cat6 for the full 100 m — Cat6 10G reach is roughly 55 m; use Cat6a or fiber.
- Ignoring that gigabit copper needs all four pairs working — a single bad pair falls back to 100 Mb on many NICs.
- Using a crossover cable mindset on modern gear — Auto-MDIX makes straight cables work in most cases.
Observation: A Cat6 run negotiates 100 Mbps on both ends.
- One or more of the four pairs damaged or mis-terminated
- Keystone/patch panel rated below the cable category
- Hard-set speed/duplex on one end
| Check | Indicates |
|---|---|
show interfaces status | Confirms the negotiated rate and duplex actually in use. |
| Cable tester on all four pairs | A failed pair directly explains the 100M fallback. |
show running-config interface | A hard-coded speed 100 overrides autonegotiation. |
Correction: Re-terminate or replace the faulty run/component; restore autonegotiation or matching hard settings on both ends.
Interface trains at 1000/full and error counters stop incrementing.
Sources
- Cisco CCNA 200-301 v1.1 Exam Topics (official PDF) — reviewed 2026-11-02
- IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group — reviewed 2026-11-02
- Cisco — Interface and Hardware Component Command Reference — reviewed 2026-11-02
Targets CCNA 200-301 v1.1 objectives. Supplemental blocks are labeled beyond exam scope.